My Mom stayed the night with us last night. She had a conference nearby and elected to stay with us, instead of in the hotel the final night.
The kids were in HEAVEN! They adore their Nana so much it's ridiculous. Dean gave her unsolicited kisses, and both boys insisted on holding her hand when they were on their way to bed. (So sweet!)
Of course, I forgot to get photos of them laughing and smiling with her all night long, so I was determined to get one of Clair this morning, before Mom left for her conference. (The boys were still sleeping.)
I took a bunch of posed pictures that turned out terrible, because Clair refused to look at the camera, playing with her toes or staring at the comforter instead. So I was so proud of myself that I thought to snap a couple pics while she was lying on the bed, cooing at my mother, and wrapping her more and more around her chubby little finger.
Here's the thing. Even though these are basic B-level iPhone pics, a good photographer would have taken these two nearly identical photos and chosen the very best one to show here. But I cannot for the life of me figure out which is best. What are the criteria I should be using? Photo-people, please help me. Which of these two pictures would you throw out, and which would you keep -- and why?
Photo A
Photo B
The life and times of the Davis family, and especially the stream-of-consciousness thoughts of Tanika Davis, the proud wife of Lester and sleep-deprived (but deliriously happy) Mom of Cary, Dean and Clair.
Friday, June 29, 2012
Thursday, June 28, 2012
SCOTUS upholds Affordable Care Act! Whoo-hoo!
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was upheld by the Supreme Court today!
Hooray!!!!!!
Thanks to a progressive President and a generations-old system of checks-and-balances, I can more readily believe that my children will get the kind of health care/treatment they need as adults, whether or not they work for an employer who is able to provide them with subsidized health insurance.
I know this was a tough topic for a lot of people. I can actually see both sides of the coin (though obviously, I am for only one side).
I do hope, however, that despite our party-line differences, people will remember today and years from now that this was not a political decision.
The Supreme Court ruled (and ruled fairly) not on behalf of President Obama -- but on behalf of the U.S. Constitution. And for the benefit of tens of millions of Americans. This is the purpose, the very point, of our system of checks-and-balances. It is our Democracy at work. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But you cannot say -- in this case -- that the system didn't work.
I love being an American. God Bless the U.S.A.!
Hooray!!!!!!
Thanks to a progressive President and a generations-old system of checks-and-balances, I can more readily believe that my children will get the kind of health care/treatment they need as adults, whether or not they work for an employer who is able to provide them with subsidized health insurance.
I know this was a tough topic for a lot of people. I can actually see both sides of the coin (though obviously, I am for only one side).
I do hope, however, that despite our party-line differences, people will remember today and years from now that this was not a political decision.
The Supreme Court ruled (and ruled fairly) not on behalf of President Obama -- but on behalf of the U.S. Constitution. And for the benefit of tens of millions of Americans. This is the purpose, the very point, of our system of checks-and-balances. It is our Democracy at work. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But you cannot say -- in this case -- that the system didn't work.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Rethinking Home Ownership
Lately, I have been having a home ownership crisis.
Here are the (many) issues with my house:
And it's not just the home values. The neighborhood is just not ideal. It's safe, which is good, and still relatively nice-looking, with (mostly) well-kept homes. But consider just one 13-hour period, from last night to this morning: A neighbor was sitting on the porch smoking cigarettes around 6 p.m., prompting me to have to close the windows in the living room, despite the fact that our air conditioner died on Sunday (more on that later). Teenagers were lighting loud fireworks around 9 p.m., when I was putting Clair to sleep, prompting me to call the police non-emergency-number [yes, I am that neighbor]. There were people arguing loudly on my street last night around 2 a.m., which woke me up. And around 7:15 a.m., a neighbor came home from his night job, pulled up in front of his house, and proceeded to sit there in his car, dozing, with his radio BLASTING. God only knows why. This does not even begin to get into the trash that blows from the end of the street and settles in front of my front steps each day. Or the teenagers who hang out at the top of the block, scowling. Or the stinky alley with the incessantly-barking dogs. Or the lack of any good retail establishments, aside from the bookstore/cafe' where I take the boys from time to time.Or a public school where I would venture to send even my worst enemy's kid.
Anyway, because of all these things, I have now decided that the snakeoil salesman who sold me the line that home ownership was an "investment," sold me a bill of goods. I will never again go into buying a house with the idea that I am buying an investment. I will warn my kids that there is no such thing as a starter home.
Instead of buying my little Baltimore rowhouse, thinking I'd sell it in 5 years, I should have waited until Lester and I were married, so we could pool our money and buy a bigger, better home in a better neighborhood -- a home we could imagine living in with a gang of small children. A home with neighbors we liked, and schools that were excellent. In other words, we should have gone into our first home thinking it could be our forever home.
This:
Or this!
Or even this:
Instead of this:
Oh well. Live and learn, right? That's what I keep telling myself.
That, and "buy a lottery ticket on your way home from work." (Now THERE's a surer investment. :-) )
Here are the (many) issues with my house:
- It is worth two pennies: I bought a house in Baltimore City at the top of the housing bubble. I didn't know at the time that it was the top of the housing bubble, but I found out pretty quickly that it was the tippy-tippy-top. Five years later, which is the timeframe I told myself I'd be looking to sell and move on, the house is worth $40,000 less than I paid for it. And that's being generous. Some estimates put it at $50-$60,000 less. But I try not to linger too long at those estimates, for fear of breaking out in hives.
- It is in a crappy neighborhood: When I moved, I bought in a neighborhood that was squarely in the city, so near a busy, bedraggled street with lots of liquor stores and carry-outs. But it was also very near a huge, green park, a city golf course and a man-made lake. I thought to myself, "This neighborhood has such great amenities. It is either on its way up or its way down." Now I know, based on the plummeting home values (see the first bullet) that it is on its way to hell, apparently.
And it's not just the home values. The neighborhood is just not ideal. It's safe, which is good, and still relatively nice-looking, with (mostly) well-kept homes. But consider just one 13-hour period, from last night to this morning: A neighbor was sitting on the porch smoking cigarettes around 6 p.m., prompting me to have to close the windows in the living room, despite the fact that our air conditioner died on Sunday (more on that later). Teenagers were lighting loud fireworks around 9 p.m., when I was putting Clair to sleep, prompting me to call the police non-emergency-number [yes, I am that neighbor]. There were people arguing loudly on my street last night around 2 a.m., which woke me up. And around 7:15 a.m., a neighbor came home from his night job, pulled up in front of his house, and proceeded to sit there in his car, dozing, with his radio BLASTING. God only knows why. This does not even begin to get into the trash that blows from the end of the street and settles in front of my front steps each day. Or the teenagers who hang out at the top of the block, scowling. Or the stinky alley with the incessantly-barking dogs. Or the lack of any good retail establishments, aside from the bookstore/cafe' where I take the boys from time to time.Or a public school where I would venture to send even my worst enemy's kid.
- It is too small: I had no way of knowing when I bought the house as a single woman that I would be married the same year (well, I knew I'd be married to Lester, but not that same year) and that just a short time later, we'd have three children within the span of two years. But all those things happened. And so the 3-bedroom rowhouse that was perfect for just me and him is now, in every way, too small. I fantasize about closets, a family room, a kitchen we can eat in, storage space, a bathroom just for us (not littered with toys), an office and a real backyard for the kids to play in. My kingdom for a 1st-floor powder room, oh gods of house-buying. My soul for a walk-in closet.
- It is old: I really liked the charm of the 1950s rowhouse when I bought it: The archways on the first level, the wood floors, the old-fashioned bathroom tiles, the chandelier in the dining room. But now, I'm paying for all that charm with the upkeep and maintenance that comes with owning an older home. So many small things are breaking, broken or falling apart I can't even list them. The wood floors are no match for the children and their toys. The plumbing - OY! And just this week, the 40-year-old AC compressor conked out. Bit the big one. To the tune of thousands of dollars. Please note summer started just four days before. Of course.
Anyway, because of all these things, I have now decided that the snakeoil salesman who sold me the line that home ownership was an "investment," sold me a bill of goods. I will never again go into buying a house with the idea that I am buying an investment. I will warn my kids that there is no such thing as a starter home.
Instead of buying my little Baltimore rowhouse, thinking I'd sell it in 5 years, I should have waited until Lester and I were married, so we could pool our money and buy a bigger, better home in a better neighborhood -- a home we could imagine living in with a gang of small children. A home with neighbors we liked, and schools that were excellent. In other words, we should have gone into our first home thinking it could be our forever home.
This:
Or this!
Or even this:
Instead of this:
| Me in 2007. This sign should say, "I am an idiot." |
Oh well. Live and learn, right? That's what I keep telling myself.
That, and "buy a lottery ticket on your way home from work." (Now THERE's a surer investment. :-) )
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Darn smart kids
The Scene:
I'm in Clair's room, changing her diaper and getting her dressed for the day.
Cary and Dean are still in their cribs. They've been awake quite awhile and have been talking and singing to/with one another, while Lester and I got ready for work. Cary has had his fill of being in the crib and is whining, incessantly.
The Exchange:
Cary: "Mommmmmmmy. Get oooouuuuuuut! Mommmmyyyyyyyyyy! I want to GET OUUUUT!"
Me: "Cary, I'm changing Clair. I'll be in to get you and Dean in a minute. Please be patient, sweetie."
Cary: Whine, whine, whine. Weep, wail and moan.
Me (talking loudly to Clair): "Clair, your brother is not being very patient while I get you dressed. Would you tell him to be patient please?"
Me to Cary: "Cary, Baby Clair says, 'Please be patient! I'm getting my diaper changed. It will be your turn soon.'"
Pause in whining.
Cary: "No. Baby Clair no say 'pay-tent.' Baby Clair NOT can talk!"
The Lesson:
I need to come up with some new tricks in the old sleeve.
I'm in Clair's room, changing her diaper and getting her dressed for the day.
Cary and Dean are still in their cribs. They've been awake quite awhile and have been talking and singing to/with one another, while Lester and I got ready for work. Cary has had his fill of being in the crib and is whining, incessantly.
The Exchange:
Cary: "Mommmmmmmy. Get oooouuuuuuut! Mommmmyyyyyyyyyy! I want to GET OUUUUT!"
Me: "Cary, I'm changing Clair. I'll be in to get you and Dean in a minute. Please be patient, sweetie."
Cary: Whine, whine, whine. Weep, wail and moan.
Me (talking loudly to Clair): "Clair, your brother is not being very patient while I get you dressed. Would you tell him to be patient please?"
Me to Cary: "Cary, Baby Clair says, 'Please be patient! I'm getting my diaper changed. It will be your turn soon.'"
Pause in whining.
Cary: "No. Baby Clair no say 'pay-tent.' Baby Clair NOT can talk!"
The Lesson:
I need to come up with some new tricks in the old sleeve.
Monday, June 25, 2012
No earrings for Clair!
So, I decided to seek expert advice about whether or not we should pierce Clair's ears.
For those of you who don't speak Social Network, that means, "I posted it on Facebook." :-)
I have NEVER, EVER gotten so many responses to anything I've ever posted! People have real opinions about this, and memories and emotions, too. It was truly fascinating to read them all.
The responses, of course, only served to make me more confused. There were good arguments on both sides of the issue. Do it early and she'll not remember the pain or tug on them -- and she'll be totally cute, to boot! Or wait till later, when she can remember the fun memory of getting them (and maybe I can be a part of that!) I'm posting some of the responses here, so you can see just why my head was spinning when it was all over. (See below.)
But, at the end of the day, Lester weighed in with his opinion, and there was no equivocation. He really doesn't want to get her ears pierced as a baby (despite the fact that it's a tradition in my family). He said he'd rather her wait until she's older and can decide on her own if she wants them. And then we can make it something she earns, perhaps. I guess if I'm being honest, I'm a little bit disappointed. My Nana (my Mom's Mom) pierced all our ears when we were babies -- her girls and her girls' girls and even some of her great-grands (the category Clair falls in). I had earrings since 9 months old -- little gold balls. And they look totally cute in pictures. I imagined Clair with little studs and I almost always cracked a little smile (even though I also cringed at the idea of her being in pain, or getting an infection, or swallowing one of her earrings - YIKES!)
But at the end of the day, this is not my family; it's OUR family -- entirely its own thing, not bound by the traditions of the family my Mom created. So I want to respect Lester's feelings on this. And I'm OK with it.
After all, this little chunky monkey doesn't need any help in the cuteness department!
Here's some of the Facebook discussion, in case you want to participate in the volley. Read it and let your head spin, too:
For those of you who don't speak Social Network, that means, "I posted it on Facebook." :-)
I have NEVER, EVER gotten so many responses to anything I've ever posted! People have real opinions about this, and memories and emotions, too. It was truly fascinating to read them all.
The responses, of course, only served to make me more confused. There were good arguments on both sides of the issue. Do it early and she'll not remember the pain or tug on them -- and she'll be totally cute, to boot! Or wait till later, when she can remember the fun memory of getting them (and maybe I can be a part of that!) I'm posting some of the responses here, so you can see just why my head was spinning when it was all over. (See below.)
But, at the end of the day, Lester weighed in with his opinion, and there was no equivocation. He really doesn't want to get her ears pierced as a baby (despite the fact that it's a tradition in my family). He said he'd rather her wait until she's older and can decide on her own if she wants them. And then we can make it something she earns, perhaps. I guess if I'm being honest, I'm a little bit disappointed. My Nana (my Mom's Mom) pierced all our ears when we were babies -- her girls and her girls' girls and even some of her great-grands (the category Clair falls in). I had earrings since 9 months old -- little gold balls. And they look totally cute in pictures. I imagined Clair with little studs and I almost always cracked a little smile (even though I also cringed at the idea of her being in pain, or getting an infection, or swallowing one of her earrings - YIKES!)
But at the end of the day, this is not my family; it's OUR family -- entirely its own thing, not bound by the traditions of the family my Mom created. So I want to respect Lester's feelings on this. And I'm OK with it.
After all, this little chunky monkey doesn't need any help in the cuteness department!
| Lounging at the beach in her hot pink bathing suit. All she needs is a drink with an umbrella in it! |
Here's some of the Facebook discussion, in case you want to participate in the volley. Read it and let your head spin, too:
·

Lisa Smith-Simpson I say the younger the better for the baby and your nerves. Some tylenol and a bottle and she will go right to sleep.

Lynn Anderson Davy I think earrings on baby girls are really cute but I didn't do it for Alice. I was 16 when I got my ears pierced. My niece got hers pierced when she turned 5 and she didn't even cry.

Linda Perlstein Doesn't really look cute to me (though of course Clair will look cute regardless). Also, I take my earrings out at night—they're not comfortable. Why make a baby have those in?

Jill Hudson Neal I think they're so cute. If you're worried about the pain, can't the person doing the piercing apply a topical ointment so baby girl doesn't feel anything?

Leeann Adams I think that perhaps it might be best to let Claire decide when she wants her ears pierced. Why do something that's potentially painful if you don't have to? And then you have to clean them. What if they get infected? I begged to have my ears pierced when I was in third grade. My mom made me wait until sixth grade. I was not happy.

Joyce Hicks We pierced talia's ears at 2. I think it's fine. But you have to twirl them 2x a day for two weeks. Talia's got infected, stuck and hurt. That may be hard in a baby.
21 June at 10:00 via Mobile ·
Fern Jackson Seay Think how old you were when you had yours pierced. You just have to take care of them..

Tricia Bishop I think it's a rite of passage you would both enjoy when she's older. I started asking when I was 5, and was told to wait until 10. I still remember everything about that trip to the mall on my 10th birthday and how grownup I felt afterward. It's a favorite memory. :)
21 June at 10:14 via Mobile ·
Rona Kobell I think it does look cute, but it's just another thing to take care of, and you have your hands full. I agree with the folks who say wait until she asks. That's what I'm doing with Maya, who will be 7 next month and hasn't asked, though a lot of her friends have theirs done. if she really wants to do it, we can do it for her 8th birthday. Gah! My niece is 5 and has hers pierced but i don't know when she did it. I got mine pierced at 6, at the dentist's, who was our neighbor. i do remember feeling really grown up and kind of exotic, wearing my little pearl earrings everywhere. But I never wear earrings anymore cuz I'm on the phone so much.
21 June at 10:25 · · 1
Tania DeLuzuriaga I got mine when I was three... my sister had to wait until 13. It was more special for her, I think. And I know the infections were a pain for my mom to deal with when I was little.

Rasheeda Crayton Childress I don't care either way, though my husband is vehemently opposed. I was actually surprised by how much he was opposed. My mother had my ears pierced when I was 2, so I have no recollection of the piercing, and had the benefits of pierced ears for as long as I can remember. So, as a grownup, I certainly like that there are no painful/dreaded memories of the piercing.

Tanika Davis Ugh. Such good points from everyone! This is tough! I got mine at 9 months old, and never had an infection or any painful memories. My sisters all got theirs at or around the same time, and also, no infections. My Nana (my Mom's mom) pierced all our ears, so it's like a tradition in our family. But I am taking into consideration everything you've all posted here, plus the fact that she could swallow them! (I read that somewhere!!) And then there's the newish societal view of babies with pierced ears. It seems some folks see them as "low-class" these days, which I'm not sure I understand. I tend to think it's really cute, when it's tasteful. But...there's that bias to contend with, too! UGH!! Lester's opposed (because of the pain factor) and I'm not as sure about it now that I have a daughter, as I once was when she was a mere theory. Have I said, "UGH!" yet?!
21 June at 10:40 · · 1
Cita D Trice laci was 6 months when i got her ears pierced. that was best because she never messed with them.
21 June at 10:40 via Mobile ·
Holly Beatty I would wait until she can decide. They aren't that painful, so it won't traumatize her when she is older. And I personally worry about choking hazard and infections. She could be sensitive to the metals, which I was. It took 3 different times in my life to get it right. But the biggest thing for me is that babies tug on their ears and when that eating gets lost and you find yourself tearing the bed apart or looking thru poopy diapers for a week you might wish you would have waited. Plus since you already know you want her to have them imagine how cool you will be when she says mom can I get earrings and you say yes lets go!

Whitney Jackson I did Sydnee, Emerson and Donovan's all when they were babies. Never had one single issue. Sleeping with earrings in was never an issue because you just get the simple piercing studs with the safety backs. Most babies don't even realize they are there and cleaning them is so simple. I say go for it and if it turns out she doesn't like wearing them when she gets older she can simply take them out. Sydnee wears earrings all day everyday but Emerson only wears them on special occasions because her hair is so long and sometimes it gets tangled. Im glad i didn't wait to do it because my kids don't even remember it. I say do it.

Sharon Pankey We did our little ones at 3 months...easier when they are babies...:-)
21 June at 10:53 via Mobile ·
Tanika Davis Elizabeth , you're going to have to think about this TWICE. Come join me in Ambiguity, why don't you? There's plenty of room.

Elizabeth Wiley I've got an answer for me :-). The answer for me is it will not be done until they are of an age where they can logically and rationally request it being done and then it will be something that they have to earn with behavior above and beyond normal expectations.

Erin Texeira We got Sophia's done at 5 months old. She cried for 15 seconds, then went to sleep in her stroller (leaning on the ears). No apparent discomfort. Over the years, only one infection, when we put in cutsie earrings and forgot to clean them. I recommend tiny hoops (find ones that secure very tightly) -- no infections ever because the metal does not touch the ear and there is no surface area under which dirt can get trapped. We rarely remove them and they are effortless. Now, the "low class" question.... Have heard it. Not your problem. As with all decisions about your kids, decide what YOU think and disregard everyone else.
21 June at 11:02 via Mobile ·
Erin Albanese We are waiting until Sophie is seven (if she wants them pierced). I got mine done at the same age and it is a fond memory - I even have photos of the event to share with Sophie. That said, I think earrings are adorable on babies!

Carolyn Brewington Edwards Everyone's responses shows me how much times have changed. Can you believe I don't even remember when I got my girls ears pierced?? Kelly - Help!! She's your baby and whatever you & Lester agree upon will be fine. One thing I do remember is I could not afford gold earrings - I don't care how small the were. :)

Raven Ellis Mine were pierced before I left the hospital by the doctor... From
what i hear some old pediatrician still do it. I had no infections... And my mom said the because I was so young, I did not even pull at them...
21 June at 11:58 via Mobile ·
Shreya Hessler Do it. The girls were 8 weeks old when I got them pierced.
21 June at 12:13 via Mobile ·
Sylvia Johnson Pryor I have no real preference either way, but I do remember it being an exciting rite of passage when I was in elementary school.

Jill Zarend-Kubatko Hmmm, tough call. I left it up to my daughter and at age 12 she was allowed. I got one with her...

Stephanie Desmon Love babies with earrings. That said, Callie's aren't pierced yet. If I had done them when she was younger, I wouldn't have had to worry about her taking care of them. Now at 5 she wants them but I KNOW she can't take care of them.
21 June at 13:20 via Mobile ·
Carla Hubbard I think getting them done when they are less than 1 is best because, as others said, they are less apt to play with them BUT I would stick to plain balls or earlobe hugging hoops so that the don't catch clothing, etc. I put some pretty cross shaped ones on Brie and it almost tore her earlobe so I she didnt wear any for a few years so now, at 4( almost 5) i catch her constantly manipulating them to the point I've threatened to take them out altogeyher
21 June at 13:22 via Mobile ·
Laura Hayes-Heuer I don't like them on babies. Plus I like my memories of begging my mom for them and then getting to go with my best friend and getting our ears pierced at the same time. I vote for it to be her decision when she's older :)

Shanda Petersen-Collier I had Ajah's pierced as soon as her pediatrician gave the green light. Never had an issue since I kept her ears cleaned. As for discomfort, I gave her some baby motrin an hour before & she was fine. She cried for about 5 minutes then she was fine. I'm so glad I didn't wait for her to get older because she's afraid of urrrything including her own shadow;)

Sharon Locke Cleaver On her first birthday. Give her a lollipop while it's being done. She won't cry.
21 June at 17:42 via Mobile ·
Jo Parker We decided against any cosmetic permanent changes for either kid until we felt they were old enough to give informed consent. Catie got her ears pierced at 10.

Mari Verrecchia DeLonde (My 2 cents) I come from a very old school conservative family who didn't allow me to get my ears pierced until I was 13, and it was then that I discovered that I am HIGHLY allergic to fake jewelry. I say, with a name like Clair Davis, she will always be a classy lady with or without earrings ;) but BECAUSE her name is Clair Davis, she can only wear platinum diamond studs (those are always classy and the other babies will be hatin!) But because I am very politically correct, has anyone asked Cary or Dean their thoughts and if they may want some earrangs? Make it a family affair! :)

Tanika Davis So, just FYI: My husband says this discussion is non-negotiable. She does not get earrings. Soooo, well...thanks for your time, folks. I really found all your thoughts very helpful! Truly. Not that I had made up my mind or anything. I bounced back and forth all day between wanting to have a memory-making experience with her when she's older and wanting her to have had her earrings all her life, like I did. But the discussion was fascinating!
Friday, June 22, 2012
How Legos Saved My Life
Before our boys were even born, we dreaded the “Terrible
Twos.”
How could we not? It seems that’s all we ever heard about,
once people found out we were having twins. “Oh, you’re going to have two of ‘em
going through the terrible twos!” “Look out! Two times the terrible twos!!” And
so on and so on.
So we were more-than-prepared, so we thought, for tantrums,
defiance and boundary-pushing. We were prepared for crying and screaming and
meltdowns galore.
But we were not prepared for Dean.
Dean’s tantrums were epic, long and drawn out, high-pitched
and woeful. His screams were ear-piercing; his tears were real. He was never
violent or scary. It was just you could tell that once he got going, he had a
really, really hard time soothing himself. The meltdown was cannibalistic: The
more he cried, the more he felt like crying, and so the more he cried. Does
that make sense?
| Don't let the cute face fool ya: This handsomest child ever gives us a run for our money. |
We tried everything recommended: Ignoring it. Talking him
through it. Distracting him. Giving him extra love and hugs. Getting down on
his level and acknowledging his feelings. Time-outs for over-the-top screaming.
More love, more hugs, more ignoring. Sometimes, I’ll admit, we were at our wits’
end, and we yelled. Sometimes I’d put him in his crib until he could calm down.
And then I’d fume, or cry, thinking about him all alone in his room unable to
sort through whatever it was he was feeling.
I was losing sleep at night about this, wanting so much to
meet his needs, and second-guessing everything I did or didn’t do throughout
the day. And it was also, quite frankly, making things tough around the house.
The screaming and crying would start from the time we got home and go on
sometimes until after bedtime. He’d freak out about everything: He wanted something he couldn’t have. He wanted to walk
and not be carried. He wanted to be carried and not made to walk. We didn’t get
his spoon fast enough. Cary had his toy. Clair was in my lap. It got to be we
hardly knew what was going to set him off. And so the days were nerve-wracking
and unpleasant for everyone. Even Cary and Clair seemed to be bothered by all
the melodrama.
I talked to my doctor about it, who, after asking a zillion
questions about intensity, frequency and duration, declared Dean well within
the realm of normal. In fact he said Cary was the one who was more abnormal, if
you will, for sorta be-bopping through the day, and quickly rebounding from
meltdowns with the simple promise of being rewarded by reading. (Not that Cary doesn’t
melt down. He does. Believe me. It's just whinier and poutier, not as furious and deep-seeded.)
I also talked to a psychiatrist friend who works with
children. Not because I thought Dean was that far-gone. I certainly did not.
But for strategies, mostly, and to assure myself that the things we were doing –
though not seemingly very helpful – were not at all harmful to my baby boy, who
so obviously needed something that we weren’t giving.
(She too assured me, after asking a zillion questions, that
he was well within the range of normal.)
Long story short, Dean is doing SO much better these days.
Much fewer tantrums, and much shorter times between freaking out and getting
over it.
So what did it?
Legos.
Yes, Legos.
I took all the things the pediatrician and my friend said and
considered them all. And some of their advice was quite helpful. But I could not shake the feeling that Dean was acting out
because of something I was or wasn’t doing. This was more than mere
Mommy-guilt. I just knew it.
So I started to think about how our days were spent being dominated
by Cary and his desire to “READ!!” All day long. Dean enjoys reading too, but
after awhile, I’d notice that he had wandered off somewhere and was, generally,
doing something he shouldn’t do. Pulling outlet covers out, or tearing a book, throwing
small toys, or pushing Clair’s swing really hard. I’d scold him or put him in
time-out, and this would go on several times a day. By the end of the day, I
think Dean was tired of being scolded, chastised and sent to time-out. By the
end of the day, we’d get the full force of his unhappiness.
So I thought, “We need to find things that Dean likes to do,
and do those more often throughout the day.” Immediately, I thought of trying Legos.
And I found Starbuilders at a client’s office and thought he’d like those too. One recent weekend, I went out and bought
them both, big tubs of them, and I cleared out the toy box in our living room
of miscellaneous junk and baby toys, and left only books, dolls, cars/vehicles, puppets,
puzzles, balls and the Legos and Starbuilders. (Their kitchen, instruments, easel and other big toys are in the playroom in the basement.)
The Legos, as I’ve mentioned, were a big hit right away. He
loved them. And I swear, now that he has something that he enjoys doing for a
big chunk of the day, he gets into far less trouble. He sits and builds long
strands of Legos and then takes them apart and does it again. He is so occupied
by this activity, he isn’t looking around for naughty things to do. The end
result is less scolding, and fewer time-outs. So that when he does have to be
disciplined for something, he takes it so much better! Oh, he’ll still scream
and cry, but for two minutes not 20.
And I’ve finally found something I can distract him with
(besides snacks). Before Legos, I had nothing that he really wanted to do to
bribe him with (besides snacks). Now the same way I can say to a melting down
Cary, “Hey, can you find Mommy a book to read?!” and he calms down to go get a
book, I can say to a melting down Dean, “Can you go get me the box of Legos? I’m
going to make a TALL building!” And he bites!
It is awesome!
The net result of the fewer timeouts and diminished
discipline is a happier, calmer Dean. And a happier, calmer house.
And that is why I say that Legos saved my life! :-)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







